Deanna Frisk, Advocacy Director                                                     Brandon Spenrath, Editor

                  Deanna@cscusa.biz                                                                         bspenrath@lwvtexas.org

 www.lwvtexas.org

                                                   
                                   Texas House                      About Us                         Texas Senate

 

 

This will be our last Newsletter of this session.  The last day of the session is Monday, May 28th.  We want to thank everyone who worked on getting articles in each time and all League members who called, emailed, and wrote their legislators when we had calls for action.  We know it helps when legislators hear from their constituents.  There will be one final wrap up newsletter on June 22nd.   June 19th is the last day Governor Perry can process bills.


Do you know someone who may have an interest in the Legislative Newsletter? Don't keep it to yourself! Share it with a friend or family member. Better yet, share it with five! Simply forward it to their email address. Their interest may lead to membership! For inquiries or to request information about membership email membership@lwvtexas.org.


IN THIS ISSUE:

  1. TRANSPORTATION

  2. JUVENILE JUSTICE

  3. REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE/WOMEN'S HEALTH

  4. WATER RESOURCES

  5. NUCLEAR WASTE

  6. LAND USE & FUNDING FOR TEXAS PARKS

  7. IMMIGRATION

  8. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM

  9. AIR QUALITY

  10. RECORDED VOTES

  11. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

  12. ELECTION LAWS

  13. CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM (CHIP)

  14. CHILD CARE

  15. ENERGY ISSUES

  16. REDISTRICTING

 

JUVENILE JUSTICE - Jayne Krawietz

HB 1 is the House Appropriations bill.  We prefer the House version to the Senate budget bill because the House bill allows money for treatment of offenders.  The Senate bill allows money for treatment and new prisons.  We feel strongly that available funds should go preferentially to treatment programs.  Although this is an adult-prison issue, the League’s position on prevention over incarceration still holds.

Please call your Representative to say you want funding to go to treatment and not new prisons.  Also ask for full funding of HB 2807, which reforms the Texas Youth Commission, as discussed in previous newsletters. 

      

1. TRANSPORTATION

Edie Jones (Tarrant Co.)

edithsjones@hotmail.com

New Information:

HB 1892 (Smith) OPPOSE   Moratorium Bill on Trans Texas Corridor (includes many other toll roads). Bill passed and has gone to the Governor’s desk.  Deadline is May 14 for signature, veto, or becoming law without the Governor’s signature. Highways 1604 and 281 are included in this moratorium. Some North Texas roads which had been approved were not in the moratorium.  TXDOT and Texas Transportation disagree with the interpretation of the moratorium for North Texas roads. The governor is waiting for a substitute bill to avoid calling a special session.  More planning needs to be accomplished.

 

2. JUVENILE JUSTICE

Jayne Krawietz (Midland)

jkrawietz@suddenlink.net

HB 2807 (Madden) SUPPORT was passed.  This is the companion bill to SB103, and they are comprehensive reform bills for the Texas Youth Commission.  This house version did specifically exclude misdemeanor offenders from the TYC facilities.  Although judges had wanted discretion to sentence misdemeanants to TYC, this bill did not allow it.  Now the important thing is for these bills to be fully funded.  The state must also not cut funds from county and city governments who will now be responsible for these misdemeanor offenders.   

Talk of tax cuts is gaining momentum at a time when these vital state services are in need of increased funding to prevent the mistreatment of juvenile offenders.  These facilities are also underserved by mental health services.  These bills address the important issues, but will not be effective unless fully funded. 

HB 427 (Madden) SUPPORT   This bill allows a District Attorney or County Attorney in counties with

Texas Youth Commission (TYC) facilities to request a special prosecution unit to prosecute crimes committed on TYC property.  One of the reasons given for the inaction at the Pyote State School was that no one claimed jurisdiction.  The bill has been voted out of committee.

HB 3309 (Bolton) SUPPORT This bill allows advocacy groups to provide information and support for sexual assault victims living in TYC facilities.  Voted out of committee and has been sent to the House Local/Consent calendar.

 


3. REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE/WOMEN'S HEALTH

Julie Lowenberg (Dallas)

jmlowenberg@sbcglobal.net

HB 1379 (Deshotel)SUPPORT – has passed both Houses and been sent to the Governor’s office. 

SB 785 (Shapiro) and SB 920 (Patrick) - OPPOSE - two dangerous anti-choice bills that have passed the Texas Senate have been scheduled for debate/vote on the House floor. An action alert was sent by LWV-TX on May 17 with urgent request to call Representatives and urge them to oppose these measures.   

SB 785 would impose onerous, intrusive reporting requirements on abortion patients and providers. The clear intent of this measure is to discourage physicians from providing abortion care and intimidate women seeking an abortion.  These reporting mandates are not required for any other medical procedure and would be made public.  

In addition to imposing unnecessary reporting requirements on abortion patients and providers, this legislation would mandate that judges who hear judicial bypass cases - in which minors seek judicial permission to have an abortion, because they cannot talk to a parent to receive parental consent - file reports as well.  This puts the personal safety and job security of judges who grant judicial bypasses at risk.  You may recall that some slightly positive changes were made to SB 785 before its passage in the Senate; unfortunately, these have all been stripped away and the bill now consists of its original text. 

SB 920 would force a woman seeking abortion care to be provided with an ultrasound image of her fetus before she is allowed to have an abortion. Although the bill language does not literally "require" the woman to view the image, the mandate that she "review" it begs the question: How can one review an image without viewing it?  The clear intent of this bill is to discourage women from choosing an abortion. (Ultrasounds are already a routine part of abortion care, and patients who want to see the image can do so.)  

As of deadline for this edition (#11) of the Newsletter, the bills had not been heard on the House floor.  If they are not heard by midnight on Tuesday May 22, they will die, according to House rules.   

BREAKING GOOD NEWS: Both SB 785 and SB 920 died in the House on May 22. Just hours before the midnight May 22 deadline for Senate bills to reach the House floor, Rep. Harold Dutton (D-Houston) raised a point of order questioning whether the official analysis of SB 785 fully reflected the text of the bill; his objection was sustained by House Speaker Tom Craddick (R-Midland). Meanwhile, on that same evening, opponents of SB 920 had slowed the process on a number of important bills that were under the same midnight deadline, effectively and successfully pressuring Rep. Frank Corte (R-San Antonio), the House sponsor of SB 920, to postpone its consideration until June 1, after the session ends. ... All measures opposed by LWV-TX that would have imposed new and unnecessary restrictions or burdens on the right to choose an abortion, EXCEPT SB 785 and SB 920, discussed above, are now “dead,” having failed to make it out of House or Senate Committees before the deadlines for bills to be scheduled for floor debate/vote.    

MORE GOOD NEWS: All of the other anti-choice bills opposed by LWV-Texas had previously died either in committees or by failure to meet deadlines. The remaining threat in the waning days of the session is that anti-choice legislators will attempt to attach amendments that would restrict access to abortions to other pending measures. 

UPDATES:

·         HB 1098 (Bonnen) OPPOSE has become law, without Governor Perry’s signature. The Governor declined to veto the bill, knowing that there were more than enough votes in the Legislature to override. Thus, the executive order issued in February that sixth grade girls must receive the HPV vaccine before entering public schools has been reversed by the legislature, with the additional provision that the vaccine cannot be mandated until at least 2011. At a press conference announcing his decision not to veto, Perry stated: “A debate which affects real lives has been hijacked by politics and posturing. I have never seen so much misinformation spread about a vital public health issue.”

·         HB 1842 (Strama) SUPPORT, the Prevention First measure, is dead. It was set on the House intent calendar but was caught in a backlog of scheduled bills and did not meet the May 10 midnight deadline for the House to hear House bills.

 

4. WATER RESOURCES

Julia Marsden (Austin Area)

jmars80278@aol.com

GOOD NEWS!  MAJOR WATER LEGISLATION IS MOVING FORWARD! 

HB 3 (Puente) SUPPORT was passed out of Senate Natural Resources by a vote of 11-0

on April 30 and the Committee report was printed and distributed.  The bill has not as yet been placed on the Senate Intent Calendar.  HB3 is a stand alone bill that addresses environmental flows.  Although state law recognizes the importance of maintaining the health of the state’s rivers and estuaries, it does not address environmental flows.  The bill would create a basin-by-basin process for developing recommendations to meet instream needs, would require TCEQ to adopt recommendations in the form of environmental flow standards, and would create the Environmental Flows Advisory Group to oversee the process. 

HB 4 (Puente) SUPPORT, passed by the House, was sent to the Senate, and referred to Senate Natural Resources on May 7.  HB4, a water conservation bill that represents the consensus recommendations of the state’s Water Conservation Implementation Task force established by the legislature in 2003, would establish a statewide water conservation public awareness program to educate Texas residents about water conservation;  would set forth legislative policy regarding the value of land stewardship for conservation purposes; and create a Water Conservation Advisory Council to monitor the development and implementation of water conservation strategies.  The bill would also require the submission of water conservation plans by retail public water utilities that provide potable water service to 3,300 or more connections and directs that the Texas Water Development Board’s water assistance fund can be used for grants for water conservation.  

SB3 (Averitt) OPPOSE was reported favorably by House Natural Resources on a vote of 7-2 on May 2.  CSSB 3 is a heavily amended version of the original SB3.  Opposition and amendments focused on the designation of unique reservoir sites.  Eliminated were Fastrill, Little River, and Marvin Nichols. Although SB3 was originally an omnibus bill that addressed environmental flows along with water conservation it became a reservoir designation bill.  Another big issue in the bill would be protections and/or benefits for landowners whose land would be part of the reservoir designation.   

CSSB1342 (Hegar) OPPOSE known as the Edwards Aquifer legislation would establish a stakeholder process to obtain a consensus to ensure that flows of the Comal Springs and the San Marcos Springs would be protected during droughts and to encourage conservation and the development of new supplies of water to meet the increasing demands of the region’s rapidly growing population.   

Why would LWV-TX oppose this bill?  The bill would raise the cap on pumping from the Aquifer by a 100,000 acre feet in the face of a statement in the author’s statement of intent that, “there is no scientific evidence available on which the authority can base decisions regarding caps for groundwater withdrawal permits, or interruptions of regular permit withdrawals to protect the spring flows at the Comal and San Marcos Springs and downstream surface water rights during low aquifer conditions.”  It would be much more reasonable and scientifically sound to assess the impact before the current cap is raised. 

 

5. NUCLEAR WASTE

Melanie Barnes (Lubbock)

melanie.barnes@ttu.edu

New Information SB 1604 Supports relating to responsibilities of certain state agencies concerning radioactive substances imposing fees and surcharges providing administrative and civil penalties.

LWV-TX has been working to achieve the goals of this legislation during the last two legislative sessions. Previously as of April 18th SB 1604 was engrossed by the Senate (29 ayes and 1 nay) and received from the Senate by the House. Currently as of May 21st SB 1604 has passed out of the House Environmental Regulation committee and is set on the House floor calendar for May 22nd. Please encourage your representatives to SUPPORT this bill. 

LWV-TX lobbies on nuclear waste issues based on LWVUS positions.

SB 1604 SUPPORT is relating to responsibilities of certain state agencies concerning radioactive substances; imposing fees and surcharges; providing administrative and civil penalties.

Currently, the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) regulates the recovery of uranium and disposal of byproduct material as well as the commercial storage and processing of radioactive waste. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) regulates the disposal of radioactive substances except for byproduct material and oil and gas naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) waste.  

SB 1604 consolidates storage, processing, and disposal activities related to uranium mining and radioactive waste under TCEQ. Most of the language of the bill is addressing the changes necessary in the Texas Administrative Code to achieve this objective. Some specifics include: 

a)            SB1604 would authorize a separate commercial storage and processing license to be issued for a site also licensed for disposal. Additionally, the bill requires an applicant, before a license is issued or renewed by TCEQ, to demonstrate to TCEQ that the applicant is financially qualified to conduct the licensed activity, including any required decontamination, decommissioning, reclamation, and disposal, by posting security acceptable to TCEQ. 

b)            For NEW sites SB 1604 requires TCEQ in adopting rules for the issuance of licenses under its jurisdiction for new sites for processing or disposal of radioactive substances from other persons, to adopt criteria for the designation of certain unsuitable sites. In addition TCEQ is required to consult with the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), the State Soil and Water Conservation Board, the Bureau of Economic Geology, and other appropriate state agencies in developing proposed rules and to consider site suitability, geological, hydrological, and meteorological factors, and natural hazards, and the demonstration of financial qualifications. 

c)            For uranium mining SB 1604 authorizes TCEQ to issue a permit that authorizes the construction and operation of two or more similar injection wells within a specified area for mining of uranium. Provides that an application for a new permit, a major amendment of such a permit, or a renewal of such a permit for mining of uranium is subject to the public notice requirements and opportunity for contested case hearing. 

LWV-TX has been working to achieve these goals during the last two legislative sessions.  As of April 18th SB 1604 has been engrossed by the Senate and received from the Senate by the House. SB 1604 passed the Senate with 29 ayes and 1 nay.

  

6. LAND USE & FUNDING FOR TEXAS PARKS

Deanna Frisk (Comal Area)

deanna@cscusa.biz

HB 6 (Hilderbran) SUPPORT Will credit to Parks & Wildlife all revenue, less allowable costs, received from the following sources.  Referred to: House Culture, Recreation and Tourism Committee. Hearing on 2-20.  The League signed in as Supporting. The bill was left pending without objection.

3/22 Sent to House Calendars committee as substituted.  Amends Section 11.035(b) of the Parks and Wildlife Code by requiring the department to credit the state parks account with an amount equal to 74 percent of the credits made to the department under Section 151.801 of the Tax Code, instead of $1,125,000 per month and 40 percent of the credits. Amends Section 11.043(b) of the Parks and Wildlife Code, by including an allocation to the large municipality recreation and parks account which will prevent competition between large and small communities for funding. This substitute adds counties with a population of 500,000 or more to the recipients of monies from the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and other grants.  It also replaces the word "city" with "municipality" in the definition of a political subdivision.  Finally, this committee substitute makes minor changes so that the language is congruent with the rest of the bill.

SB 252 SUPPORT Companion Bill. Referred to Senate Finance Committee

  1. grants or operation of concessions in state parks or fishing piers
  2. publications on state parks, state historic sites, or state scientific areas
  3. fines or penalties received from violations of regulations
  4. fees and revenue collected associated with state park lands
     

HB 12 (Hilderbran) SUPPORT Rep. Hilderbran, Chairman of the committee, has moved this bill out of House Culture, Recreation and Tourism.  It is the bill that transfers all historical sights from Parks & Wildlife Dept. to the Texas Historical Commission along with giving Parks Dept. more money.  The League has no position on who should take care of historical sights but we are hoping Parks Dept. gets the increase in funding they need.  HB 12 has been passed in the House and received in the Senate. 5-15 Referred to Senate Finance New Information:  05/19/2007- Voted favorably from Senate Finance as substituted.  This substitution sets up a task force to determine the amount of revenue that must be generated to fund the policy decisions made by the 80th Legislature regarding state parks.  Not later than January 25, 2009, it shall prepare and present to the 81st Legislature a report that describes the findings and includes recommendations regarding the specific items that should be included in the definition of “sporting goods”.  The Historical commission and the Parks & Wildlife Dept. shall assist in a joint interim study of the need for and the terms and conditions of any transfer of certain state historic sites from Parks Dept.
 

HJR 71 (Hilderbran) SUPPORT Proposing a constitutional amendment relating to the dedication of the revenue received from the sporting goods tax.  On 2/06/2007- Referred to House Culture, Recreation and Tourism Committee. The League signed in as supporting at the hearing.  4-17 voted favorably from committee.  Sent to Calendars Committee on 4-24.
 
HB 3447 (Rose) SUPPORT Filed bill would regulate land development in a county wholly or partly located in a priority 
groundwater management area (PGMA) designated by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, that contains 
territory from seven or more counties. The commissioners court of a county may regulate, by order, the subdivision to use 
a water or wastewater system, have a minimum fire suppression system, require improvements to all streets and roads, 
require a minimum amount of open space or impose a limit on amount of impervious cover for recharge and runoff 
purposes, impose impact fees, prescribe the density or number of residential units that can be built per acre of land, 
requiring buffer zones or adopting other measures to minimize conflicts between incompatible land uses or adopt any 
other regulation necessary to regulate or manage land development. Referred to House County Affairs.  Hearing 4-18, 
League sent testimony and signed in.  HB 3447 passed favorably from Committee. Sent to House Calendars Committee.  
Committee amendments include:  A county election must be passed in order to enforce.  It needs to be held 
on the regular November uniform election date.

The bill authorizes the commissioners' court of a county to regulate land development in the unincorporated area of the county by:

(1) requiring a subdivision to use a water or wastewater system under standards adopted by the county;

(2) requiring improvements to all features of streets and roads in a platted subdivision;

(3) regulating road frontage and building set-backs from roads, streets, or alleys in a platted subdivision; or

(4) regulating the location, design, construction, extension, size, and installation of drainage facilities and other required public facilities in a platted subdivision

All references to impervious cover on the recharge zone, fire suppression systems, impact fees and buffer zones have been eliminated!

 

7. IMMIGRATION

Linda Hanratty (Tarrant County)

llswenson@yahoo.com

 

HRC 11 (Solomon) SUPPORT would direct the Office of the Attorney General of Texas to pursue all available remedies, including but not limited to initiating a lawsuit or joining other states in a suit against the United States Attorney General, to demand the enforcement of all existing federal immigration laws by the federal government and to recover any money owed Texas by the federal government for costs incurred by the state in dealing with illegal immigration. The League supports economic assistance to those areas of the state disproportionately impacted by immigration.  This funding should come primarily from federal, state, and private sources. Referred to the House State Affairs Committee.  04/30/2007- Voted favorably from House State Affairs; 5/1/2007 - Sent to House Calendars committee.

HB 904 (Zedler) OPPOSE would prohibit the construction or operation  by a local governmental entity of a day labor center used as a facility for the employment of aliens not lawfully present in the United States.  The League believes the state should support job training and placement for immigrants. The day labor centers serve for a job placement purpose.  The bill was filed on January 26, 2007, and referred to the House State Affairs Committee on February 8, 2007. 04/30/2007- Voted favorably from House State Affairs as substituted; 05/02/2007- Sent to House Calendars committee; 5/8/2007 - Set on House floor calendar for 05/09/2007 as substituted.

 

8. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM

Maxine Barkan (Austin Area)

mlbarkan@aol.com

New Information   SB 64 (Zaffirini) SUPPORT has been enrolled after being passed by both houses with the House amendment. It had substantial legislative support. To review, the bill would require general-purpose committees to report contributions over $5,000 from the ninth day before an election until the second day before an election. The report must include the amount of the contribution, the full name and address of the contributor, and the dates. Heretofore, the public has not been aware of large contributions made by special interests to PACs until after an election. This has been referred to as “late train” contributions, providing a disclosure loophole big enough to drive a train though. The League has supported this part of campaign finance reform for several sessions. The next step is the governor’s signature. 

New Information HB 158 (Naishtat, et. al.) SUPPORT requiring an individual to report the fair market value of a gift of cash or check to be reported that would identify who the contributor is. The bill passed out of the Elections Committee and was referred to the Senate State Affairs Committee. Rep. Naishtat threw his support to SB 129 (West) SUPPORT which was substantially the same bill with different language. The bill subsequently passed both houses and is ready for the governor’s signature.  

Both these bills are steps refining disclosure laws and forcing candidates and PACs to be more transparent in letting the public know who has given money and how much in a timely manner. It is one way to assure the public to have more confidence in the electoral process.  


SB 64 (Zaffirini and Strama) SUPPORT
was heard in the Elections Committee April 25, 2007. The bill would require general-purpose committees to file additional reports from the ninth day before an election until the second day before an election if the contributions exceed $1,000. A substitute was offered to increase the ceiling to $5,000. The substitute was passed 5-0 and referred to the House Calendars Committee. This legislation would prevent large contributions close to an election and that would not be reported until after an election. The League agreed to the substitute and signed in favor of the bill. 

New Information  HB 158 (Naishtat) SUPPORT was heard in committee on March 14, 2007. The League signed in favor of the bill at the hearing. The bill has several co-sponsors who had similar bills to offer. They have been combined into one, CSHB 158 after making sure the language of the bill would accomplish the goal. To review, last year the Texas Ethics Commission, in an Advisory Opinion which the League with several other organizations requested, stated that a state official did not have to report the value of a gift of cash or a check. This was in response to two checks last summer totaling $100,000 that were reported to the Ethics Commission as checks with no identifying information. In the Advisory Opinion, the Commission said they were not required to request this information.  The Commission’s advice was to ask the legislature to pass legislation that would be specific. CSHB 158 would require an individual to report the fair market value of a gift when filing a financial statement with the Ethics Commission. No fiscal note is required. If passed, the financial reporting would be required after January 1, 2008.  CSHB 158 was scheduled for debate in the House on April 11, 2007 and was passed to engrossment and sent to the Senate.

 

9. AIR QUALITY

Laura Blackburn (Houston Area)

laura2blackburn@earthlink.net

Only two of the House bills we have been following had been heard by the House Committee on Environmental Regulation by May 7.  However, there has been action on several of our priorities, as indicated below.

HB 1252 (Bonnen) SUPPORT requires that not only should a pre-construction permit be reviewed every ten years, it must also be reviewed during a permit amendment.  HB 1252 was reported favorably out of the Environmental Regulation Committee on April 12.  On May 3 it was replaced in the House on second reading by its companion bill, SB 1673 (Averitt.)  HB 1252 was then “laid on the table.”  SB 1673 was passed on third reading in the House on May 4 and passed to engrossment.  The Senate had passed SB 1673 on April 12.  This will be a valuable addition to achieving clean air in Texas.  New information:  SB 1673 was sent to Gov. Perry for signature on May 10. 

HB 2475 (Hochberg) SUPPORT had a similar fate.  This is the House version of the “toxic hotspots” bill and, while it never had a hearing in the House Environmental Regulation Committee, companion bills SB 1855 (Gallegos) SUPPORT and SB 1906 (Ellis) SUPPORT still have a chance of passing. 

SB 12 (Averitt) SUPPORT updates the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP) and the Low-Income Vehicle Repair Assistance Program (LIRAP.)  SB 12 passed the Senate on March 21 and a hearing was held in the House Committee on Environmental Regulation on April 10. A committee substitute was offered on May 2 and it was voted favorably out of the Environmental Regulation Committee.  SB 12 was sent to the House Calendars Committee on May 8.  New information:   SB 12 was passed to engrossment by the House on May 17!

SB 93 (Gallegos) SUPPORT Provides for fence-line monitoring and sets up a procedure for setting ambient air standards for highly reactive volatile organic compounds (HRVOCs).  This bill was referred to the Natural Resources Committee on January 23, and no further action has been taken. 

SB 124 (Ellis) SUPPORT requires Texas to adopt the California standards for cars and light trucks.   The bill was left pending in the Senate Natural Resources Committee after the hearing on April 10, and no further action has been taken. 

SB 529 (Watson) SUPPORT is the commonly-known “clean school bus” bill.  It passed the Senate on April 11 and was referred to the House Environmental Regulation Committee on April 12.  New information:  SB 529 was voted out of committee on May 11 and was set for the House floor calendar on May 22.

SB 1855 (Gallegos) SUPPORT establishes the “toxic hotspots” pilot program and sets ambient air standards for priority toxic air contaminants:  benzene, 1, 3 butadiene, diesel particulate matter, ethylene dichloride and nickel.  SB 1855 was heard in the Natural Resources Committee on April 17 and is still pending.  

B 1906 (Ellis) SUPPORT is similar to SB 1855 by Gallegos relating to toxic hotspots.  It was referred to the Senate Natural Resources Committee on March 22. 

SB 1924 (Gallegos) SUPPORT establishes an Air Pollutant Watch List for various geographic areas of the state.  It was heard by the Senate Committee on Natural Resources on April 17, and passed the Senate Natural Resources Committee on April 19.  On May 3 SB 1924 was set on the Senate Intent Calendar for May 4. :  The Senate passed the bill on May 8, and it was sent to the House, where it was referred to the Committee on Environmental Regulation.  A hearing was held on for May 15 and LWV-TX presented written comments in support of the bill.  New informationSB 1924 passed the House Environmental Regulation Committee on May 18 and was sent to the House Calendars Committee.

 

10. RECORDED VOTES

Linda Camin (Dallas)

lrcamin@tx.rr.com

New Information:  It is with the sincerest regret that we have to report the breakdown in negotiations between the House and the Senate to reconcile differences in the two versions of HJR 19 passed. On Friday, HJR 19 (Branch) was point ordered by Representative Talton.  This cut off consideration of HJR 19 (Carona). Because the caption to the House version stated that votes were to be recorded on “final passage,” the Senate requirements for recorded votes on all amendments, preliminary votes and appointments were deemed to be non-germane. Representative Branch is willing to support a constitutional amendment for recorded votes on final passage only in the House and to exclude the Senate. Senator Carona believes that voters should know how their legislators vote throughout the process and does not want to include the Senate in a bill that requires less than their current practice. As quoted in the Dallas Morning News (“Bill on recording of votes causes clash,” May 19, 2007):  

“If the choice is between not having any progress, and only having progress for the House, then I’m certainly open to that,” Mr. Branch said.  “I applaud them for making an effort, and I support whatever he does in terms of language that’s acceptable to the House.  Mr. Carona said. “I just don’t want to include the Senate in a bill that would be inferior to what the Senate already has. …We’ll just do our own [constitutional] amendment next session.”

HJR 19 (Branch) is now in the hands of the Senate. Calls (512-463-0001), faxes (512-936-6700) and emails (ltgov.state.tx.us/contact) to Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst requesting his leadership in passing the bill are in order. Also, contacting your Texas Senator will be helpful as well.

While the League would prefer Senator Carona’s bill, Representative Branch’s bill is a start on the road for Texans to know how their legislators are voting.  Passage by citizens of a constitutional amendment to record votes on final passage would send a message to the representatives. Let’s not let the sun set on recorded votes this session.

 

11. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

Gloria Suarez-Sasser (San Marcos Area)

gloriasasser@sbcglobal.net

HRJ 23 (Naishtat) Support Calls for a moratorium on the execution of persons convicted of capital offenses. The bill would grant the governor the power to issue an order to prohibit the Department of Criminal Justice from performing executions on or after the effective date and until the order is revoked. This bill was filed in November 13, 2006 and was referred to the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee on February 6, 2007. The bill was scheduled for a hearing on April 24, 2007 and was left pending.  On April 27, 2007, the bill was voted favorably from the committee and on May 1, 2007 was referred to the House Calendars Committee.

 

12. ELECTION LAWS

Barbara Weinstein (Dallas)

gewwendt@swbell.net

HB 218 (Brown) OPPOSE Relating to requiring a voter to present proof of identification. We are waiting for a vote on HB 218 that has passed the House.  The bill has been on the Senate Intent Calendar every day since May 1 and on the Business Calendar every day since May 1.  It can be pulled for a vote at anytime.   

New Information:

So far it would seem at least one good election bill has passed both houses this session.  That would be HB 770 (DUTTON) relating to requiring the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to provide notice to certain persons of the right to vote. 

For all of you nail biters out there, the opposition appears to be holding on HB 218 and HB 626.  We oppose both of these bills and can only hope that the opposition holds.  Remember, HB 218 is the Voter ID bill and HB 626 is the bill that requires additional identification when voters register.

 

13. CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM (CHIP)

Julia Marsden (Austin Area)

jmars80278@aol.com

SB 266 (ZAFFIRINI) SUPPORT that would, among other things, increase Medicaid coverage from 6 to 12 months.

The Substitute CSSB 266 (OPPOSE) would lay out a CHIP Compromise and a compromise on 12-month coverage in children’s Medicaid and would provide “fixes” to the eligibility system in both.  

A recent report from the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) announced that 17,078 fewer children will be covered by CHIP in May than in April.  This is the second largest number of children ever to be disenrolled in one month, second only to immediately after state budget cuts in 2003. 

LWV-TX is a member of the CHIP Coalition and the Insure Texas Kids Campaign. As a member we will be working to help bring about The Cure.  The Coalition will work to:

  • Implement 12 months continuous eligibility for CHIP and Children’s Medicaid
  • Eliminate bureaucratic roadblocks to encourage personal responsibility and help low income families achieve self-sufficiency:

a.       Fix problems with the Integrated Eligibility System to prevent eligible kids from losing CHIP and Medicaid coverage

b.       Eliminate the CHIP asset test

c.       Eliminate the CHIP 90 day waiting period for uninsured children

d.       Deduct childcare and child support expenses when calculating income for CHIP

e.   Provide adequate reimbursement for Medicaid and CHIP providers

f.    Invest in outreach and education to ensure that all eligible children get the care that they need.

HB 109 by (Turner and Davis) joined forces to submit a committee substitute for the 30 CHIP bills that were heard in the Human Services committee. CSHB 109 passed 8-1 and achieves much of the CHIP Coalition Agenda.

·        Children would renew coverage annually instead of every six months. Income eligibility would allow child-care expenses to be deducted when calculating income. The current 90 day waiting period for uninsured children would be eliminated, and Texas CHIP’s original crowd-out policy would be reinstated.       

·        The asset test was modified:  Families would now be limited to $10,000 in assets (up from $5,000), and the vehicle allowance was increased from $15,000 to $18,000 for the first vehicle and $4,650 to $7,500 for the second vehicle.

Although the coalition had wanted the asset test to be eliminated and sought additional income deductions, we are pleased to see the bi-partisan support for the bill. The House voted overwhelmingly to pass CSHB. Thanks for all your help with the action alert.

The Texas house overwhelmingly passed HB 109 (Turner, Davis, J, Dukes, England and Pena) SUPPORT which was engrossed on 4-4 and received in the Senate 4/10.  Additionally the bill has a long list of coauthors. 

The CHIP program is not for slackers. CHIP insures the children of working parents who earn too little to afford private health insurance but make too much to be eligible for Medicaid.  To quote the Austin American Statesman, “this is the best deal in town”.  For every dollar CHIP spends in Texas, the federal government pays 72 cents and the state pays 28 cents. 

The battle now moves to the Senate where it faces a real uphill battle!  Lt. Governor Dewhurst opposes allowing children to enroll for 12 months.  (The CHIP Coalition has included the re-enrollment form in material given to legislators and believes that this is a complicated process, not the easy two-page form described by some.) 

In addition to this hurdle the State is faced with the settlement costs of Frew v. Hawkins, a 14 year old dispute over the state’s obligations to children on Medicaid.  Legislators want to complete the agreement before the end of the session on May 28 because it is estimated that this will cost the state over $700 million over the next two years.  It is not known how this will affect the House budget and the money that will be needed to restore CHIP to pre-2003 levels.

 

 

14. CHILD CARE

Marlene Lobberecht (Houston Area)

marlene@lobberecht.com

HB 332 (Rep. Chisum, Rep. Swinford) OPPOSE Child Care Legislation:  Exemptions from childcare licensing requirements. This bill describes characteristics of organizations and entities that childcare licensing exemptions DO NOT apply to. Examples include any state operated facility, an agency foster home, a youth camp, and a facility operated in or connected with a shopping center, business, religious organization or establishment where children are cared for during short periods when parents are engaged in other activities. New Information:  Voted favorably from House Public Health as substituted 04/26/2007 and sent to House Calendars committee 05/01/2007.

HB 406 (Rep. Hartnet) OPPOSE Relates to license requirements for preschool and after-school programs operated by public or private schools. This bill, similar to HB 332, describes characteristics of organizations and entities that childcare licensing exemptions DO NOT apply to. Examples include any state operated facility, an agency foster home, a youth camp, and a facility operated in or connected with a shopping center, business, religious organization or establishment where children are cared for during short periods when parents are engaged in other activities. New Information Voted favorably from House Human Services as substituted 05/03/2007.

HB 482 (Rep.Villarreal) SUPPORT Would allow children to remain in public pre-kindergarten after they have been adopted from foster care.  New Information: The House passed HB 482 and it is awaiting a hearing in the Senate. Referred to Senate Education 4/03/2007.

SB 50 (Zaffirini) SUPPORT Early Childhood Professional Development Partnership. The initiative will support the professional development of early care and education professionals by establishing a training partnership and career path within the profession, expand annual training required of caregivers from qualified trainers and accountability within licensed child care programs.  This addresses the number one and two child care program priorities of the LWV-TX.   SB 50 is also the number three priority of the Texas Early Care and Education Coalition (TECEC). Update: SB 50 voted favorably from the Senate Education Committee as substituted.  LWV-TX testimony supporting Early Care & Education provided to Senate Education Committee and voted favorably out of Committee. Received in the House April 24; sent to the House Education Committee April 27 and hearing set for 05/08/2007.

New Information: Appropriations Committee approved $ 20 million for SB 50 Thursday, May 17th contingent upon passage of bill in the House. Set on House floor calendar for May 22, 2007.

 

15. ENERGY

Susan Barrick (Lubbock)

susanbarrick@sbcglobal.net

HB 1214 (Christian et al.) SUPPORT Texas' 79th Legislature set 500 MW of “non-wind” renewable generation as a target for the year 2015 to encourage renewable energy technology based on biomass, geothermal, solar, hydropower and other novel sources.  Implementation of this goal has lagged because legislation did not state if the 500 MW non-wind goal was mandatory or voluntary.   This bill would clear up the intent of the Legislature that 500 MW of non-wind renewable generation installed by 2015 is mandatory. New Information: Reported favorably without amendment out of the Senate Business and Finance Committee.

HB 1415 (Leibowitz) SUPPORT Recommended for Local & Consent calendar.  This bill would amend the Utilities Code to require the Public Utility Commission by rule to ensure that credits for electricity produced by a public school building's solar panels correspond to the value of the electricity at the time of day it is provided by the school to the electric transmission grid and distribution center. New Information: Referred to the Senate Business and Finance Committees.

SB 1612   (Van de Putte) COMPANION

SB 658 SUPPORT Would set up a program to accredit buildings as energy efficient, with standards updated bi-annually and an energy efficiency scorecard system to enable home-buyers to compare houses and qualify for energy-efficient mortgages under the National Housing Act.   This program may also help communities qualify for emissions reduction credits if they adopt codes to meet or exceed energy-efficient building or energy performance standards. Passed out of the Senate onto the House on 4/19.  Referred to the House Government Reform Committee, 4/24.
CSSB 663 (Hegar) SUPPORT  Producer incentives for fuel ethanol and biodiesel plants established in 2003 to use definitions and guidelines that exclude second and third generation biofuels. This bill would add a definition for "renewable diesel" to encourage production of renewable diesel fuel through the producer incentive program.  New Information: Placed on the General State Calendar. 

CSHB 1000 (Burnam) SUPPORT This bill would give sales tax exemptions on Energy Star appliances (as designated by the EPA and Dept. of Energy) for home and personal use two weekends each year in order to bring about energy conservation and mitigate the need for new electric generation capacity in Texas.  Passed out of the House and referred to the Senate Finance committee 4/17.

CSHB 1415 (Leibowitz, Strama, Anchia) SUPPORT This bill would amend the Utilities Code to require the Public Utility Commission by rule to ensure that credits for electricity produced by a public school building's solar panels correspond to the value of the electricity at the time of day it is provided by the school to the electric transmission grid and distribution center.  New Information: Referred to the Senate Business and Finance Committee.

CSHB 2713  (Bonnen & Hancock)  SUPPORT This bill was filed March 6. It would establish an interim special committee on electric energy generation capacity and the environmental impact of electrical generation. It would be composed of chairs of the House Environmental Regulation, Energy Resources and Regulated Industries committees, chairs of Senate Natural Resources and Business and Commerce committees, four additional house members appointed by the speaker and 5 additional members of the senate appointed by the Lt. Governor. This committee would inventory existing electrical generation facilities and study demand for generation capacity and availability of infrastructure technology to plan for and meet demand for the next 25 years.  New Information: Placed on the Senate Local and Uncontested Calendar.

CSHB 3693 (Straus) SUPPORT Electric utilities in Texas are required to achieve energy efficiency and conservation.  This bill would reduce electrical consumption and demand and thereby protect ERCOT's reserve generating margin and prevent crises during peak load demand times. CSHB 3693 would improve and expand existing energy efficiency measures, allow better management of customer demand, update building energy codes, and require state agencies to utilize equipment and appliances that are more energy efficient.  The resulting reductions in electricity use should prevent short-term peak demand shortfalls and help avoid costly new power plants and transmission lines. Referred to Senate Natural Resources Committee 5/11.

 

16. REDISTRICTING

Nancy Wilson (Richardson)

wilson972@aol.com

New Information: 

The rumor that it was the intent of  Rep. Joe Crabb, chairman of the House Redistricting Committee, to take a pass this session on Redistricting legislation prompted the League to strongly support passage of the bills NOW during this session in invited testimony at the May 2 hearing where we supported SB 1068 (Wentworth)/HB 3777 (Rose).  The League also supported HJR 31 (Ritter.

The rumor proved true.  All redistricting bills died in the House committee.  The following 5/19/07 Dallas Morning News editorial bears repeating.

“The Texas Senate favored letting an independent commission draw congressional boundaries, but the House weasled out. Big time. The reform died there yesterday, when the House Redistricting Committee failed to report out GOP Sen. Jeff Wentworth's proposal to strip some of  the politicking out of redistricting. Never mind that numerous top House Republicans wanted the proposal to go to the House floor for a vote. Republican Rep. Joe Crabb, the redistricting committee's chair, kept it wrapped up, which means the bill is dead until the 2009 session. Guess he must like partisan brawls like we had in 2003. Go figure.”

#####


It is an objective of the League of Women Voters of Texas to serve you as one of the most useful and trustworthy sources of legislative information. We don't do it for you, we do it alongside you. To help further our mission of encouraging the informed and active participation of citizens in government, click on the link below. Every bit helps us, helps you influence public policy through education and advocacy for the betterment of our community.


To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list, email lwvtexas@lwvtexas.org with the subject heading “subscribe/unsubscribe-LNL.”  Legislative Newsletter subscriptions are free and sent by email.

 

League of Women Voters of Texas

1212 Guadalupe Street, #107

Austin, TX 78701

512-472-1100

lwvtexas@lwvtexas.org

www.lwvtexas.org

*Please disregard the statement that reads  "You have received this e-mail because you opted to do so. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing list please click here" as every League member receives the LNL.

*If you are aware of a member that is not receiving the LNL please advise them to check their spam and/or deleted items folder as it may have been automatically filtered out. Adding bspenrath@lwvtexas.org to your address book may correct this issue.